Hiroshima :: Japan
A bit of a downer, really.
Places: Hiroshima
Coolest thing I did: Saw the trees that not only survived the bomb but are still growing.
Coolest thing I didn´t know: The Hiroshima baseball team is called....the Carp. Seriously. Go Carp!
History is a funny thing. It's hard to know where the truth lies when things are told from people's imperfect memories, and it gets even worse when governments and their money get involved with preserving it. While I know both the Japanese and Germans have been very, very apologetic over their actions during the Second World War (and the Allies less so) it's hard to be objective when walking around the monuments and museums of Hiroshima (all which inevitably have the word Peace in their title somewhere).
The narrative in the Peace Memorial Museum tells the story of a city that built itself up as a military power during Japan's rise as a world power during the first half of the 20th century to a point where during the final stages of WWII it was the southern command of the Japanese army and the point where the defence of Japanese soil would probably be directed from. The war was pretty much lost at this point but (if we are to believe the story we're told by the Allied Powers) Japan was ready to fight to the last man to repel invasion. The bits I found most enlightening were the things you didn't expect to be shown.
Extracts from the diaries and letters from such luminaries as Einstein, Roosevelt, Truman and Oppenheimer tell the story of the Manhattan project and the lead up to the creation of the atomic bomb. We find out the Americans deliberately wanted to see the effects of a nuclear weapon on a functioning population and did not want to give any advantage to the Germans, who they suspected were far advanced in building their own atomic weapons. As a result as early as 1943 it was decided that mainland Japan would be the target of the first atomic weapon and as bombing raids started on Japan itself there would be none to take place over possible atomic bomb targets. The Americans specifically wanted to use this weapon at least once, both to dispassionately observe its effects and to warn all future foes (which would eventually mean their allies, the USSR) of the power they held.
In the end, geography and good weather conspired to pick Hiroshima. The target was a bridge which happens to be two bridges meeting in a T shape (easy to sight visually for the bombardier) and to prove this was a scientific endeavour, two other planes launched recording equipment to collect data. While it's unfair to make comparisons to the Nazis experiments on Jews it does seem to stem from the same mentality.
The impact point (hypercentre) is marked with a small granite memorial you could almost trip over so as to not take away from the A-bomb dome a hundred metres away. A Czech designed government building on the river front survived the blast with it's stone walls and the framework of it's dome intact. This has been kept in the same condition as it was after the blast, as a reminder of what took place. Of all the memorials it's the least contrived and I hope the one that survives all the rest.
As the single biggest geopolitical event since the invention of gunpowder it's hard to predict what would have happened had the Americans warned the Japanese of the existence of atomic weapons, or had they demonstrated the power to them. In the scale of human life lost in WWII 150,000 is a rounding error, but it was the impact of killing them in this way that may have ended the war when it did. It seems the US were indeed hell bent on using it. Would the Japanese have actually fought to the last man, thus extending the numbers of Allied casualties? Would the Soviets have paid as much attention and kept pushing on with conventional warfare in Europe if they suspected the US unwilling to use such a terrible weapon on actual people? Would there have been the relative calm of the Cold War or would we have had another World War by now? No one would disagree that the horror that Hiroshima and Nagasaki endured should never be repeated, but can we be so sure the alternatives would have been no worse?
Nothing in my travels has made me think about what evil people are capable of like this has except for the memorial at Auschwitz. It seems that World War II was indeed humanities Whoa, Whoa, WHOA! moment when we realised that we were plumbing the depths of what humanity could do. While the second half of the 20th century was not all sunshine and lollypops compared with much of the rest of human history it's been relatively peaceful. The biggest problem is we now have so many nuclear weapons we could destory the planet many times over. I don't think that's a problem beyond solving, but places like this need to exist to remind us why we need to solve it.